<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for mDaniel.net Asterisk Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net</link>
	<description>Various Experiences in Asterisk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:51:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on MWI Notification by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-7510</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=14#comment-7510</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-7509&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-7509&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Wei&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
          &lt;p&gt;In Asterisk 1.4, msg$count.txt needs to include the leading 000 (i.e. msg0000.txt), so I changed it to msg000$count.txt. The message count will be wrong if there are more than 10, though.&lt;/p&gt;
         &lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s true, somewhere in mid-1.4 the developers switched to checking for specific filename formats.  I&#039;ve updated the script and post detailing the changes required to make it work for all messages.  Thanks for the catch :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-7509"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-7509" rel="nofollow"> Wei</a> :</strong></p>
<p>In Asterisk 1.4, msg$count.txt needs to include the leading 000 (i.e. msg0000.txt), so I changed it to msg000$count.txt. The message count will be wrong if there are more than 10, though.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s true, somewhere in mid-1.4 the developers switched to checking for specific filename formats.  I&#8217;ve updated the script and post detailing the changes required to make it work for all messages.  Thanks for the catch <img src='http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MWI Notification by Wei</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-7509</link>
		<dc:creator>Wei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=14#comment-7509</guid>
		<description>In Asterisk 1.4, msg$count.txt needs to include the leading 000 (i.e. msg0000.txt), so I changed it to msg000$count.txt. The message count will be wrong if there are more than 10, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Asterisk 1.4, msg$count.txt needs to include the leading 000 (i.e. msg0000.txt), so I changed it to msg000$count.txt. The message count will be wrong if there are more than 10, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volgain patch for asterisk v1.2 by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=5#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>Alex, I&#039;ve gone and updated the patch for you.  I don&#039;t have the resources to test it, but it was fairly simple.  I don&#039;t anticipate you having any trouble with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I&#8217;ve gone and updated the patch for you.  I don&#8217;t have the resources to test it, but it was fairly simple.  I don&#8217;t anticipate you having any trouble with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Volgain patch for asterisk v1.2 by Alex</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=5&#038;cpage=1#comment-7507</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=5#comment-7507</guid>
		<description>Hi,

we use a asterisk 1.2.32, i just searched for such a patch you published, but something was changed in  app_voicemail.c, because your patch does not work, i get the follwing error:

File to patch: app_voicemail.c
Patching file app_voicemail.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 387 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1654.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1819 (offset 36 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1838 (offset 36 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 5981 (offset 69 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 6019 (offset 69 lines).
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file app_voicemail.c.rej
done

Maybe you can adapt your patch for the newest asterisk 1.2.32 version? We need to gain the emailed recordings!

Best regards from Germany,
Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>we use a asterisk 1.2.32, i just searched for such a patch you published, but something was changed in  app_voicemail.c, because your patch does not work, i get the follwing error:</p>
<p>File to patch: app_voicemail.c<br />
Patching file app_voicemail.c using Plan A&#8230;<br />
Hunk #1 succeeded at 387 (offset 1 line).<br />
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1654.<br />
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1819 (offset 36 lines).<br />
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1838 (offset 36 lines).<br />
Hunk #5 succeeded at 5981 (offset 69 lines).<br />
Hunk #6 succeeded at 6019 (offset 69 lines).<br />
1 out of 6 hunks FAILED &#8212; saving rejects to file app_voicemail.c.rej<br />
done</p>
<p>Maybe you can adapt your patch for the newest asterisk 1.2.32 version? We need to gain the emailed recordings!</p>
<p>Best regards from Germany,<br />
Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Polycom vs. Cisco by Video Conferencing Freeware</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-7506</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Conferencing Freeware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11#comment-7506</guid>
		<description>Hey there! Great post! I’ve been a lot of video conferencing these days on television like the advertisements of CISCO. It’s good to see that we are getting closer through communications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there! Great post! I’ve been a lot of video conferencing these days on television like the advertisements of CISCO. It’s good to see that we are getting closer through communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Polycom vs. Cisco by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-7505</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11#comment-7505</guid>
		<description>@Zubair

You&#039;ve obviously never used Cisco phones with the SIP firmware as they&#039;re being used in this article.

Cisco Phones running SIP (7940&#039;s and 7960&#039;s.. the other ones are not allowed on anything but CCM due to licensing requirements) are by far the least feature rich and manageable phones on the market for SIP based systems.  Also, the 7912, 7940, and 7970 all running the SIP firmwares are ABSOLUTELY not identical interface-wise.

Try loading a Cisco 7940 with the SIP firmware and tell me how to load the web interface that was on the phone when it was running SCCP.  Also, the SIP firmwares have been in flux since the day they came out, and Cisco is always changing how they provision them.  The mass quantities of email I receive regarding Cisco provisioning proves that you&#039;re incorrect when using Cisco phones on systems OTHER than Cisco Call Manager.

Have you even used a Cisco phone for a system other than Cisco Call Manager?  If so, you should actually take a real close look at what you posted because you&#039;re misinforming yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zubair</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve obviously never used Cisco phones with the SIP firmware as they&#8217;re being used in this article.</p>
<p>Cisco Phones running SIP (7940&#8217;s and 7960&#8217;s.. the other ones are not allowed on anything but CCM due to licensing requirements) are by far the least feature rich and manageable phones on the market for SIP based systems.  Also, the 7912, 7940, and 7970 all running the SIP firmwares are ABSOLUTELY not identical interface-wise.</p>
<p>Try loading a Cisco 7940 with the SIP firmware and tell me how to load the web interface that was on the phone when it was running SCCP.  Also, the SIP firmwares have been in flux since the day they came out, and Cisco is always changing how they provision them.  The mass quantities of email I receive regarding Cisco provisioning proves that you&#8217;re incorrect when using Cisco phones on systems OTHER than Cisco Call Manager.</p>
<p>Have you even used a Cisco phone for a system other than Cisco Call Manager?  If so, you should actually take a real close look at what you posted because you&#8217;re misinforming yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Polycom vs. Cisco by DJ Monroe</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-7504</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11#comment-7504</guid>
		<description>Great article. I actually wrote a similar article comparing Asterisk with Call Manager recently.  I happened to stumble across this post after the fact.  If you get a chance you should check it out:  http://blog.bitwaretech.com/2009/02/asterisk-vs-cisco-unified.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I actually wrote a similar article comparing Asterisk with Call Manager recently.  I happened to stumble across this post after the fact.  If you get a chance you should check it out:  <a href="http://blog.bitwaretech.com/2009/02/asterisk-vs-cisco-unified.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.bitwaretech.com/2009/02/asterisk-vs-cisco-unified.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Need Ideas by Mike Munroe</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-7502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Munroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=15#comment-7502</guid>
		<description>Im looking for away  to send a voice mail message and include a dundi lookup

eg  server A message in mail box  222 needs to forward a VM message  to  mailbox 333 on another server B  S  ervers are set up with Dundi and calling to ext to ext  works  

I dont  what to set up  central Mail  do to  possible network outages

I do have  10  servers connect at present</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking for away  to send a voice mail message and include a dundi lookup</p>
<p>eg  server A message in mail box  222 needs to forward a VM message  to  mailbox 333 on another server B  S  ervers are set up with Dundi and calling to ext to ext  works  </p>
<p>I dont  what to set up  central Mail  do to  possible network outages</p>
<p>I do have  10  servers connect at present</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Polycom vs. Cisco by Zubair</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11&#038;cpage=1#comment-7501</link>
		<dc:creator>Zubair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=11#comment-7501</guid>
		<description>I think you didn&#039;t study Cisco IP Phones at all.Please go to cisco.com or call their customer care number to get the clear picture of Cisco IP Phones.

I don&#039;t know how Polycom Phones works and all that you mentioned above about polycom is good if it is there.....

---&gt;I know Cisco IP Phones and I have been doing lot of Cisco IPT intsllation.almost all Cisco phones has identical when it comes to User Interface.

---&gt;You can also Manage Cisco IP Phones remotely and we have been doing it quite successfully.

---&gt;Firmware upgrade path is quite simple and as we just need to put the required bin image on TFTP and the phone will pick it up while booting.

-------You are trying to fool your management so please be fare and do good research before you put such comments against any technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you didn&#8217;t study Cisco IP Phones at all.Please go to cisco.com or call their customer care number to get the clear picture of Cisco IP Phones.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how Polycom Phones works and all that you mentioned above about polycom is good if it is there&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8212;&gt;I know Cisco IP Phones and I have been doing lot of Cisco IPT intsllation.almost all Cisco phones has identical when it comes to User Interface.</p>
<p>&#8212;&gt;You can also Manage Cisco IP Phones remotely and we have been doing it quite successfully.</p>
<p>&#8212;&gt;Firmware upgrade path is quite simple and as we just need to put the required bin image on TFTP and the phone will pick it up while booting.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-You are trying to fool your management so please be fare and do good research before you put such comments against any technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Need Ideas by Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=15&#038;cpage=1#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asterisk.mdaniel.net/?p=15#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Well, as long as you asked...

I&#039;m curious if I can use DUNDi to allow me to have redundant phone registration servers.  For example, can I have my phones dynamically register to one of two servers and then have the dialplan just work.  Also, if one dies, can my phones all register with the lone survivor until the second server is repaired.

There is a real shortage of useful DUNDi examples for this sort of scenario (heck, maybe it isn&#039;t possible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as long as you asked&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious if I can use DUNDi to allow me to have redundant phone registration servers.  For example, can I have my phones dynamically register to one of two servers and then have the dialplan just work.  Also, if one dies, can my phones all register with the lone survivor until the second server is repaired.</p>
<p>There is a real shortage of useful DUNDi examples for this sort of scenario (heck, maybe it isn&#8217;t possible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
