An ongoing battle... Which phone is better?
October 16th 2006As everyone may know, we currently run our Asterisk system with a mishmash of Cisco phones. Mostly 7940’s, some 7912’s, and a few others here and there. However, we’re in the process of evaluating various types of phones to expand our network into a more standards compliant, capable network of phones. This is what brings me here today, which phone do we like the best?
~\n
I think it’ll be easier to just list out the pros and cons of our system that make it better for us.
- Cisco (7940, 7960, etc)
- Pros
- Easy configuration for some phones
- Particularly the 7940/7960 pairs are extremely simple to configure. Provisioning an entire campus of these phones is as easy as dropping a 5 line configuration file in the tftp boot directory.
- Great sound quality out of the box
- Easy configuration for some phones
- Cons
- Configuration isn't unified
- If you try to configure anything but the 79[46]0's, get ready for some hell with binary commands to do text->binary conversions for the phone to download it's configs.
- Stripped SIP firmware
- The SIP firmware doesn't support everything it could, such as Shared Lines.
- COST
- Configuration isn't unified
- Pros
- Polycom (430, 501, 601)
- Pros
- Unified configuration
- Good sound quality
- More SIP compliant
- Cons
- Slow boot time
- Smaller screens and less XML browsing support
- Pros
- Aastra
- Pros
- Same physical design as Meridian phones
- More customizable
- Cons
- Both of the phones we received were dead within one week of receiving them, so we weren't able to do much testing.
- Shoddy VLAN support
- Pros
We still haven’t fully decided on a product to use, but I’m personally going to recommend the Polycom’s, as they tend to be the better of the three major companies we looked into. There are a number of other companies (Grandstream, SNOM, etc) whose products would be great for smaller companies, but they don’t feel very “professional”.